Sociological Reasons of Replacement of the Ordeals by the Canon-Law Oaths in the Period of Middle Ages
Keywords:
ordeals, oaths, Fourth Lateran Council, Canon law, Sacred Scripture, Roman-Germanic influences, procedural-law development of probation, sociological reasonsAbstract
The institution of oath was into the form historically, as well as on the present applied in several of contemporary legal systems creatively developed by the canonists while practically applying the so-called Roman-canonical procedure. Since it was utilized for the whole centuries in the Church courts, canon law elements dominated in it from the beginning. In spite of the fact that they were on the one hand defined as individual type of ordeals, on the other hand they played one of the most important tasks in transfer from secular-law ordeals of the older type towards the standards of Roman-canon full proof including the principle of free valuation of proofs by the judge. Its own role played also original Old Testament Biblical notions including the components of Roman law and German law. Nevertheless the oath was also the part of several older religious-legal systems that highlights its justness and significance from the naturalism point of view of the development of human society. The main goal of the article is to point out briefly the social background and reasons of the replacement of the ordeals of the older type by Canon-law oaths, especially in the period of Middle Ages.
References
1. BAKER, J. H.: An Introduction to English Legal History. London: Butterworths, 2002.
2. BALDWIN, J. W.: The Intellectual Preparation for the Canon of 1215 against Ordeals. In Speculum. Vol. 36 (1961).
3. BARTLETT, R.: Trial by Fire and Water: The Medieval Judicial Ordeal. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
4. BRUNDAGE, J. A.: The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 2008.
5. CAENEGEM, R. C. van: The Birth of the English Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
6. CLARK, H. B.: Biblical Law. Portland: Binfords & Mort, 1943.
7. DAMAŠKA, M.: Evaluation of Evidence. Pre-Modern and Modern Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
8. DU CANGE, Ch.: Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis. Vol. 6. Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1954.
9. GARCÍA Y GARCÍA, A.: Constitutiones Concilii quarti Lateranensis una cum Commentariis Glossatorum. Vatican City: Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana, 1981.
10. HELMHOLZ, R. H.: The Spirit of Classical Canon Law. Athens – London : The University of Georgia Press, 2010.
11. HIRZEL, R.: Der Eid: Ein Beitrag zu seiner Geschichte. Lepzig : B. G. Teubner, 1902.
12. HUDSON, J.: Formation of the English Common Law: Law and Society in England from the Norman Conquest to Magna Carta. London: Longman, 1996.
13. HYAMS, P. R.: Rancor and Reconciliation in Medieval England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.
14. LEA, H. Ch.: Superstition and Force. Essays on the Wager of Law – the Wager of Battle – the Ordeal – Torture. Philadelphia: Collins, 1866.
15. LEA, H. Ch.: A History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages in Three Volumes. Vol. III. New York – London: The Macmillan Company, 1906.
16. LEBIGRE, A.: La Justice du Roi: La vie judiciaire de l'ancienne France. Paris : Editions Complexe, 1995.
17. LÖWENTHAL, E.: Der Gerichtseid. Frankfurt : Selbstverlag, 1929.
18. LUHMANN, N.: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied am Rhein: Luchterhand, 1969.
19. MACNAIR, M.: Vicinage and the Antecedents of the Jury. In Law and History Review. Vol. 17 (1999).
20. MCAULEY, F.: Canon Law and the End of the Ordeal. In Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 26 (2006), No. 3.
21. MORIARTY, E. J.: Oaths in Ecclesiastical Courts. Washington : Catholic University of America Press, 1937.
22. NÖRR, K. W.: Zur Stellung des Richters im gelehrten Prozess der Frühzeit: Iudex secundum allegata non secundum conscientiam iudicat. München: C. H. Beck, 1967.
23. NÖRR, K. W.: Romanisch-Kanonisches Prozessrecht. Erkenntnisfahren erster Instanz in civilibus. Berlin – Heidelberg : Springer, 2012.
24. SHOEMAKER, K. B.: Criminal Procedure in Medieval European Law. In Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistische Abteilung. Vol. 129 (1999).
25. SCHULTE, J. F. von: Geschichte der Quellen des kanonischen Rechts von Papst Gregor XI. bis zum Concil von Trient. Stuttgart : Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, 1877.
26. SILVING, H.: The Oath: I. In Yale Law Journal. Vol. 68 (1959), No. 7.
27. The London Encyclopaedia or Universal Dictionary of Science, Art, Literature, and Practical Mechanics. Vol. XVII. London: Thomas Tegg, 1845.
28. VLADÁR, V.: Usura v stredovekom kánonickom práve. In HIŠEMOVÁ, T. – KMECOVÁ, D. (eds.): Pôžička či úžera? Nútený výkon rozhodnutia – rímskoprávne základy a problémy aplikačnej praxe. Košice: Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika, 2018.
29. VLADÁR, V.: Vymáhanie kánonickoprávneho zákazu úrokov v stredoveku a ranom novoveku. In Studia theologica. Roč. 21 (2019), č. 2.
30. WHITMAN, J. Q.: The Origins of Reasonable Doubt. Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial. New Haven – London: Yale University Press, 2008.
31. ZIEGLER, L. V.: Trial by Fire and Battle in Medieval German Literature. New York: Camden House, 2004.
32. ZIMMERMANN, R.: The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Cape Town : Juta, 1990.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Faculty of Law, Comenius University Bratislava
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
