Commitment of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the preliminary ruling procedure focusing on public procurement

Authors

  • Daniela Ježová The Institute of European Law, Comenius University

Keywords:

European Union, Court of Justice, preliminary ruling procedure, procurement

Abstract

The article addresses the question of the effects of the rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the preliminary ruling procedure as a special type of procedure. The article reflects the question of the binding nature of the decisions thus issued, in particular with regard to the scope of bindingness itself, ie whether it is only the binding of the inter partes or the binding of erga omnes, or other scope of bindingness. Particular attention is paid to the field of public procurement and the importance of the preliminary ruling in this area of law.

References

1. 238/81 CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v. Ministri of Health, rozsudok z 06. 10. 1982, Zb.r. 3415

2. -46/93 a 48/93 Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v. Nemecko a The Queen v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Faktortame Ltd. a iní rozsudok z 05.03.1996, Zb.r. I-01029

3. C-129/00, Komisia vs Talianska republika, rozsudok z 9. decembra 2003, I-14672

4. C-167/97, Regina v. Secretary of State, rozsudok z 9. februára 1999, I-666

5. C-26/62 NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos proti Nederlandse administratie der belastingen, rozsudok z 05. 02. 1963, Zb.r. 3

6. C-28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV, Jacob Meijer NV, Hoechst-Holland NV v. Administration fiscale néerlandaise, rozsudok z 27. 03. 1963, Zb.r. 61

7. C-31/87 Gebroeders Beentjes z 20 septembra 1988

8. C-328/96 Komisia vs. Rakúska republiky, rozsudok z 28. októbra 1999, I-07479

9. C-337/06 Bayerischer Rundfunk and others, rozsudok z 13. decembra 2007, I-11173

10. C-343/96, Dilexport, rozsudok z 9. februára 1999, I-600

11. C-373/00 Adolf Truley, rozsudok z 27. februára 2003, I-01931

12. C-380/98 University of Cambridge, rozsudok z 3. októbra 2000, I-08035

13. C-44/95 Mannesmann, rozsudok z 15 januára 1998

14. C-599/10 SAG ELV Slovensko a.s. a iní proti Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie, rozsudok z 29. 03. 2012, C:2012:191

15. C-6/64 Costa v. ENEL, rozsudok z 15. 07. 1964, Zb.r. 585

16. Jacob, M.: Precedents and Case-based Reasoning in European Court of Justice – Unfinished Business, Cambridge University Press, NY, 2014

17. Ježová, D.: Prejudiciálne konanie pred Súdnym dvorom EÚ, Eurokodex, Žilina, 2013

18. Ježová, D.: Všeobecne o konaní o predbežnej otázke pred Súdnym dvorom Európskej únie, In.: Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae, Tomus XXX, 2012, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave,

19. Komárek, J.: Federal Elements in the Community Judicial System: Building Coherence in the Community Legal Order, Comonn Market Law Review, Vol. 42, p. 9, 2005.

20. Recommendations to national courts and tribunals in relation to the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings (2018/C 257/01)

Downloads

Published

2023-07-19

Issue

Section

Articles