International law subjectivity of the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62874/afi.2023.1.05Keywords:
European union, International Law, EU Law, international law subjectivityAbstract
The paper focuses on selected aspects of international law subjectivity of the European Union. While international law subjectivity itself is today taken as a fact, its formation is still linked to a number of questions. In the light of the above, in the first part of the paper, the author addresses the question of when the EU was granted international law subjectivity. It was really only with the Treaty of Lisbon, or maybe we could talk about the international law subjectivity of the EU law earlier. Here, the paper is based on analysis inextricably linked with historical research. The ambition is to verify the hypothesis of the existence of the EU’s international law subjectivity even in the pre-Lisbon period. Subsequently, the second part of the paper deals with the issue of the scope of the EU’s international law subjectivity. In this part, the paper focuses on the examination of rules of the EU law, but also rules of international law. Stress is laid on analysis accompanied by comparison. The aim is to verify whether the scope of the international law subjectivity of the EU includes the so-called standard components of the international law subjectivity of an international organization as they have been identified by the theory of international law.
References
1. BROWNLIE, I.: Principles of Public International Law. 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
2. CARREAU, D., MARRELLA, F: Droit international. 11e édition. Paris: Pendone, 2012.
3. CASTILLO DE LA TORRE, F.: The Court of Justice and External Competences After Lisbon: Some Reflections on the Latest Case Law. In. EECKHOUT, P., LÓPEZ-ESCUDERO, M. European Union´s External Action in Times of Crisis. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2016.
4. CLOOS, J. et al., Le traité de Maastricht. Genèse, Analyse, Commentaire. 2e édition. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1994.
5. ČEPELKA, Č., ŠTURMA, P.: Mezinárodní právo verějné. Praha: C.H.Beck, 2008.
6. DAILLIER, P., PELLET, a.: Droit international public. 7e édition. Paris: L.G.D.J, 2002.
7. DIEZ DE VELASCO, M.: Instituciones de derecho internacional público. 16 edición. Madrid: Tecnos, 2007.
8. KLUČKA, J.: Medzinárodné právo verejné. (všeobecná a osobitná časť). Bratislava: Iura Edition, 2008.
9. KOLLÁR, M.: Právna spôsobilosť Európskej únie na uzatváranie medzinárodných zmlúv. In. Slovenská ročenka medzinárodného práva 2008, Ročník I.. Bratislava: Slovenská spoločnosť pre medzinárodné právo pri SAV
10. MILTON, G., KELLER-NOËLLET, J.: The European Constitution. London: John Harper Publishing, 2005.
11. NEUWAHL, N.: Legal Personality of the European Union – International and Institutional Aspects. In. KRONENBERGER, V.: The European Union and the International Legal Order: Discord or Harmony. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2001.
12. TICHÝ, L., ARNOLD, R., SVOBODA, P., ZEMÁNEK, J., KRÁL, R.: Evropské právo. 3. výdání. Praha: C.H.Beck, 2006.
13. VRŠANSKÝ, P., VALUCH, J. a kol.: Medzinárodné právo verejné. Všeobecná časť. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer, 2012.
Judikatúra Súdneho dvora EÚ:
1. Rozsudok z 31. marca 1971, ERTA, 22/70, EU:C:1971:32.
2. Rozsudok z 30. septembra 1987, Demirel, 12/86, EU:C:1987:400.
3. Rozsudok z 11. júna 2014, Komisia proti Rade, C-377/12, EU:C:2014:1903.
4. Návrhy generálneho advokáta k stanovisku z 21. decembra 2016, EU-Singapur Dohoda o voľnom obchode, 2/15, EU:C:2016:992.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave a autori

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.